<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Bohemian Blog &#187; Print Design</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/category/print-design/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog</link>
	<description>sharing bohunk ingenuity with the world</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 31 Jan 2012 20:06:31 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Why GIMP Is NOT Inadequate</title>
		<link>http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/2011/why-gimp-is-not-inadequate/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/2011/why-gimp-is-not-inadequate/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Jan 2011 17:50:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Digitalia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Linux]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OSX]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Photography]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Print Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Web Design]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/?p=799</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Troy Sobotka, who appears to be a very accomplished commercial artist working in video, illustration and photography, made a relatively brief list of problem areas for Gimp on his blog: http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html He makes some good points, but the last half of his post is a lot of alarmist speculation. The obvious answer to improving Gimp [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com"><img class="alignright size-full wp-image-801" title="gimp" src="http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2011/01/gimp.png" alt="" width="256" height="256" />Troy Sobotka</a>, who appears to be a very accomplished commercial artist working in video, illustration and photography, made a relatively brief list of problem areas for <a href="http://www.gimp.org/">Gimp</a> on his blog: <a href="http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html">http://troy-sobotka.blogspot.com/2011/01/why-gimp-is-inadequate.html</a></p>
<p>He makes some good points, but the last half of his post is a lot of alarmist speculation. The obvious answer to improving Gimp is to contribute to its development. Complaints about difficult developers sounds like a bunch of complaining. With any open source project you have to earn the respect of the senior developers through consistent work, usually the not-so-exciting kind. With any open source project there are more users than developers and certainly more users suggesting ideas than making any attempt to squash bugs, write documentation or provide objective and helpful feedback. Opinions and assholes.</p>
<p>Anyway, I left a LONG comment today and wanted to duplicate that comment here. The only thing I should have added is a need for Gimp to continue improving color management and that&#8217;s why I <em>just said it</em>. Anyway, here&#8217;s my comment:</p>
<p>I&#8217;m a professional graphic designer. I use Photoshop and Gimp at a very high level of proficiency. Just to point out where I&#8217;m coming from. I like Pshop and Gimp for their different strengths, but some of the above arguments are wrong. Gimp certainly has room for improvement, but anyone that actually used Photoshop in 1996 knows that Pshop itself has come a LONG way in 15 years.</p>
<p>I would like to point out something that needs to be understood about the importance of bit-depth. I am constantly working with hi-res jpegs from a wide variety of professional photographers every day. You know how many of those files use 32 bits/channel? None. You know how many of those files use 16 bits/channel? None. They are ALL in 8 bits/channel. It&#8217;s certainly great to have the higher bit-depth options, but the importance of that capability in terms of graphic design/manipulating images for press is greatly exaggerated.</p>
<p>Also, CMYK color space in Photoshop is misused by graphic designers because most of them know very little about color space and/or color management. Some of us know (I don&#8217;t mean to offend anyone) but the majority of designers I have worked with are completely oblivious. I&#8217;ve even seen creative directors explicitly instruct their designers to select &#8220;discard color profile&#8221; when confronted with the &#8220;What should I do?&#8221; dialog in Photoshop. The need for CMYK color space, though useful and great, is also greatly exaggerated.</p>
<p>I also think the complaints about the UX are very subjective and usually only illustrate how little effort the commenter put into learning about and using the Gimp.</p>
<p>Two things that would greatly improve Gimp and many people&#8217;s impressions of Gimp are:</p>
<ul>
<li>better image scaling/anti-aliasing algorithms</li>
<li>layer groups and layer styles</li>
</ul>
<p>Those two things are certainly complex, but if they were implemented, and it sounds like they will be soon, I would be extremely satisfied with Gimp&#8217;s capabilities.</p>
<p>I think it&#8217;s healthy to critique software, but the Gimp rarely receives praise for its remarkable capabilities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/2011/why-gimp-is-not-inadequate/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Printing Marks in Inkscape</title>
		<link>http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/2009/inkscape-printing-marks/</link>
		<comments>http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/2009/inkscape-printing-marks/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Sep 2009 04:24:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>jason</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Print Design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/?p=255</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not sure when this feature was added, but I’m running the Inkscape 0.47 preview and discovered that the default install now includes a “Printing Marks” feature. You can access it from the main menu: Extensions > Render > Printing Marks The small options window that pops up allows you to adjust a variety of settings [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/PM-Overall.png" alt="Inkscape Printing Marks Extension Interface and Output" title="Inkscape Printing Marks Extension Interface and Output" width="658" height="671" class="aligncenter size-full wp-image-256" /></p>
<p>Not sure when this feature was added, but I’m running the Inkscape 0.47 preview and discovered that the default install now includes a “Printing Marks” feature. You can access it from the main menu:</p>
<p><code>Extensions > Render > Printing Marks</code></p>
<p>The small options window that pops up allows you to adjust a variety of settings for the position of the marks as well as the type of marks to be displayed, seeming to cover all of the needs of a typical commercial printing process.</p>
<p><img src="http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/PM-Marks.png" alt="PM-Marks" title="PM-Marks" width="223" height="396" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-259" /><img src="http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/wp-content/uploads/2009/09/PM-Position1.png" alt="PM-Position" title="PM-Position" width="223" height="396" class="alignleft size-full wp-image-261" /></p>
<p>The “Live Preview” option makes it easy and efficient to adjust the settings to match your desired output. Once you hit <strong>Apply</strong> the specified marks are added to your document as vector art in a new, locked layer titled “Printing Marks”.</p>
<p>In the past I’ve manually created crop marks when needed, but this is a major step on the road to serious recognition and use by graphic design professionals. Eventually it would be great to see these options removed to a print and/or export dialog interface, but this is an excellent option to have as well.</p>
<p><a href="http://inkscape.org">Inkscape</a> is an open source and free application built around the SVG recommendation that makes it easy to create vector images. I use it to create illustrations as well as single-page layouts of all sizes. In fact, I recently created a business card layout with Inkscape, exported as PDF and sent to a printer to create offset business cards. The cards turned out great without any problems. A serious vector art tool.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.bohemianalps.com/blog/2009/inkscape-printing-marks/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>5</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

